Page 1 of 3

fizzle's progress

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:21 am
by fizzleboink
March 12-16: Level 1
March 19-23: Level 2
March 26-30: Level 3
April 2-13: Level 4
April 16 - x: Level 5

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:29 am
by Admin
Wow, Awesome progress!

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:32 pm
by fizzleboink
April 24: Body fat % ~= 20%

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:37 pm
by Admin
Good, do you know what it was when you started?

PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:07 am
by fizzleboink
No but I'll try and keep track now. I imagine it was a couple percent more, but that's just a guess.

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 4:59 pm
by fizzleboink
May 2, Bodyweight of 218, body fat % is 20%.

I think I sorta fibbed last week by reading the chart slightly wrong, I think I was closer to 21% last week.

So total change is +1 pound in weight, and a loss of (almost) 1% of body fat.

I wouldn't mind keeping this pace for a little while!

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:52 pm
by tomahawk53
that's awesome fizzleboink


I hope I get those results myself

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:31 pm
by Norman
That's excellent !

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 4:41 am
by fizzleboink
May 9, Bodyweight 214, fat 20%.

I sort of doubt that I lost 4 pounds of muscle in a week, so something must be up. It might have been the time of day that I measured myself. I'll have to be more careful from here on.

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:21 am
by Admin
water

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:40 am
by fizzleboink
June 6: Weight 209, fat ~19%

Yay. 5lbs in 4 weeks seems standard.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:18 am
by Admin
Your body comp is probably shifting allot, looking at your performance gains I would guesstimate that you are losing fat and gaining muscle so you have probably droped more fat than the weight change sugests.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:22 am
by fizzleboink
It certainly has. But from what I’ve learned through other web sites and books, is that you can’t build muscle and lose fat at the same time. You build muscle when you have a calorie surplus, and lose fat when you are in a calorie deficit (assuming you exercise). But you’re right, I’m seeing both at the same time. How can this be? Are those other sources wrong, or is this type of training somehow different?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:04 am
by Admin
It is possible just difficult we are doing functional fitness so things are a little different we are not putting on big cosmetic muscle we are adding mostly functional and core muscle. Allot of that type of research comes from the bb world and they are talking about putting on allot of muscle while cutting fat below 7%. What we see is more subtle. There is allot if data suggesting that IF is a good way to do both in unison I have successfully done both while using IF and zone zonish eating protocols using this type of training but that might not have been possible if I my body fat was around 7% at the time.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:11 am
by fizzleboink
Is there somewhere I can read more about IF? I need more info before I consider trying it.